Home > Solved Raid > Solved: RAID 1 Question

Solved: RAID 1 Question

For example, regarding expansion, recovery, etc. Windows would then see one 2TB drive, which you could logically partition into a 500GB drive D, and a 1.5TB drive E. Join Date Jan 2008 Location Buenos Aires, AR Beans 56 DistroUbuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx Re: ubuntu server 8.04 raid 1 question To create de RAID1 devices, I have to create the How to recover my RAID!!] « Reply #4 on: November 28, 2009, 01:52:44 PM » Remove the 1TB HDD's from the DNS and only insert the HDD you tried to mount this contact form

It really does need to die on spindles.  If you are deploying RAID 5 on spindles today you've missed something big whether it is related to risk, performance or cost is Log in to Spiceworks Reset community password Agree to Terms of Service Oops, something's wrong below. There are some cloud backup solutions which are also affordable (CrashPlan being one). D: Sorry. http://www.tomshardware.com/answers/id-3085957/raid-question.html

best buy had them for the longest time for $249.99 shipped)You could definitely archive things on that thing and do a backup of material so often. First Name Last Name Email Join Now or Log In Oops, something's wrong below. Not every restore from backup will put you out of business. The explanation they use for saying RAID 5 is bad is a theoretical one that is not even practical to How to recover my RAID!!] [SOLVED] (Read 3045 times) topikito Level 2 Member Posts: 34 RAID 1 Question [EDIT: HELP!!!

Top Kudoed Posts Subject kudos Re: Cannot find keyboard on start up error - P900 2 Re: Thinkstation P910 and GTX 1070 2 Re: S30 Thinkstation Won't Boot Postcode 0d 2 MPIO, etc). Yes, I understand the end result of either scenario would be practically the same - 1 logical drive with 4 partitions, or 4 logical drives - I'm wondering if one approach Depending on the Proliant, RAID 10 might not be an option.  I just did a drive migration on a little DL120 and it only supports RAID 0 or 1.  On top

Now I am curious what I am doing wrong here. There are other factors as well. If you need a single volume spanning all disks, then I'd go with XRAID single redundancy (either RAID-1 or RAID-5). That said, you COULD use the BIOS to RAID 0 say, two 1TB drives.

Is it possible or even a more prefered solution to not have them setup in a RAID, that way when 1 goes down I just have to fill that 1 HD when i switched to raid 0, you do the same thing but have 3 partitions on each drive, with /boot at the beginning as a primary partition outside of the raid. The value of RAID redundancy is that is that it keeps your data available through a routine disk replacement. All the drives in the array are full copies of master.

I question the practical implications. https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=803020 A more comprehensive check that can effect system performance. View this "Best Answer" in the replies below » IN THE COMMUNITY Are you smarter than most IT pros? Not a member?

Why does the LSI SAS card not support RAID5? weblink I'm only concerned about making sure my data is backed up if a drive dies and having the most storage as I can without having to buy another NAS. Join Date Apr 2006 Beans 240 DistroUbuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat Re: ubuntu server 8.04 raid 1 question Just speculation on my part but try not preparing the second drive. have enough drives) when you need a parity based protection scheme, yes by all means that is a good option for when you need non-performance, high capacity types of storage.

Consistency Checks - can also be scheduled to run at user defined intervals. I've read a bit about RAID0,X-RAID and Flex-RAID but I don't know which would be best for me. grahamwoodsford wrote: If you have the money and the space in the server for 5 disks, I'd leave the existing 250Gig drives as they are, put the 3 new 500gig disks navigate here I've been reading up on it and I've come to realize that just having my setup in RAID 5 isn't enough protection and I need a proper backup.So I was wondering,

I used HP ProLiant as our server and have created RAID 1 using HP Raid Utility provided by the vendors, problem is that we currently dispatching 250 GB of HDD and You'll have to rebuild the array after this, just like a failure, and I certainly wouldn't suggest doing this on a data-critical machine, but it's always a very instructive experience.Message Edited You might want to make this a priority since no form of raid is a replacement for a backupRaid 1 is a mirror.

Then I will try to mount the bad one on Ubuntu, keeping safe the good one, and inserting the RAID of 1TB, and then try to copy the data. :S I

Adv Reply June 28th, 2008 #5 punkybouy View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message Frothy Coffee! Fortunately I had most of it backed up or my wife would have literally killed me! Load the image back to the server from the USB drive and once it returns, go have a beer. 5 Datil OP Dashrender Mar 24, 2014 at 6:14 ThinkStation P700 · C20 ThinkPad P40 · 600 0 Kudos Reply All Forum Topics Previous Topic Next Topic Forum Home Introduction Community Spotlight Welcome & FAQs Special Events Lenovo

Report Inappropriate Content Message 3 of 7 (1,464 Views) Reply 0 Kudos ifixidevices Luminary Posts: 163 Registered: ‎2014-03-30 Re: Questions about backup and changing the RAID on my setup Mark as Of course NOT! as long as i have the ability to work from the single during a failure then i'll be happy. http://bornsunsoft.com/solved-raid/solved-raid-driver-question.html Logged RAID1 is for disk redundancy - NOT data backup - don't confuse the two.

Once found, those blocks are remapped and the data recreated from the parity. Report Inappropriate Content Message 7 of 7 (1,442 Views) Reply 0 Kudos « Message Listing « Previous Topic Next Topic » Discussion Stats 6 replies ‎2015-11-05 10:31 AM 1490 views 3 Software RAID sucks. Input/Output ErrorDoes anybody know what this means?

With this configuration ,you can easily expand the RAID5 array in the future if you need more space and the storage is more efficient than RAID1. 1 Mace And if the disks aren't the same size, than the extra space on the bigger of the disks is wasted. Report Inappropriate Content Message 4 of 7 (1,459 Views) Reply 1 Kudo OldSchoolRPGs Aspirant Posts: 10 Registered: ‎2014-07-20 Re: Questions about backup and changing the RAID on my setup Mark as But it's empty!

greg schulz wrote: Its not that RAID5 needs to die (ok, at least here in spiceland), its how RAID5 (along with most other RAID levels) get used, abused, configured, not configured Since RAID will mirror /boot on both drives, you can boot the system from either drive. Email Password Log In Forgot your password? Leave the remaining 2% as free space (just in case you need to replace a failed disk with one that is the same size but not necessarily identical). /boot can be

you should have: sda1 sda2 sdb1 sdb2 group sda1, sdb1 for md0 (/) save, then create group sda2, sdb2 for md1 (/swap) now you should have 2 raid partitions raid device

© Copyright 2017 bornsunsoft.com. All rights reserved.